Human relationships are often shaped by the unresolved complexities that arise when conflict is avoided. This avoidance—so deeply ingrained and habitual—does not just shape the dynamics between individuals; it reveals a painful truth about the fragility of connection when discomfort is perpetually evaded.

Some individuals live in a carefully constructed fantasy, one where everything is “picture perfect.” On the surface, this fantasy appears harmonious, even desirable. But underneath lies a chasm of unspoken intergenerational tensions, unmet needs, and unacknowledged truths. True connection, however, requires confrontation—not for the sake of discord, but for the sake of growth, truth, and intimacy. To avoid conflict is to avoid the essence of life itself: the struggles, the contradictions, and the ongoing negotiation of what it means to be human.

I have encountered this dynamic firsthand in a deeply personal relationship, where conflict avoidance has created an unbridgeable gulf. Whenever I have tried to address the tensions, the response has been one of retreat. The conversation threatens the fragile harmony, and suddenly, my loved one retreats, overwhelmed by mental health struggles that seem to arise only when the illusion of perfection is challenged. This pattern has left me grappling with guilt, frustration, and the existential reality that some relationships, no matter how foundational, may never transcend their limitations.

Jean-Paul Sartre described bad faith as the act of self-deception, of avoiding the truths that challenge us. In the unwillingness to confront conflict, there is a refusal to embrace the messy, dynamic reality of connection. Instead, there is an insistence on preserving a static, idealized image of the relationship—one that demands silence and complicity.

Slavoj Žižek critiques this societal obsession with harmony and superficial peace, pointing out that such avoidance often masks deeper, unacknowledged tensions. In this context, the “picture-perfect” fantasy of the relationship is not just a defense mechanism—it becomes a prison, locking both parties in a cycle of denial and disconnection.

Silence, in such dynamics, becomes a betrayal of authenticity. Friedrich Nietzsche reminds us that conflict, struggle, and even pain are essential to growth. To shy away from these challenges is to deny the very essence of life. Similarly, Carl Jung’s concept of the shadow looms large in this context. By avoiding conflict, unresolved fears, insecurities, and emotions are relegated to the unconscious, where they fester and manifest in passive-aggression or disconnection. This unintegrated shadow, left unacknowledged, weighs heavily on relationships.

Hannah Arendt offers another lens through which to understand this dynamic. Her emphasis on the importance of dialogue and action in human connection underscores that relationships thrive not on avoidance but on engagement. For Arendt, the refusal to engage in difficult conversations is not merely a personal failing—it is an abdication of the responsibility that comes with being in relationship with others. The avoidance of conflict denies the possibility of plurality, the space where true understanding and intimacy can emerge.

These ideas resonate deeply in my own journey. To engage in a superficial relationship—one that denies the existence of real pain and real growth—has proven unsustainable. Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue underscores the necessity of treating others as “Thou,” as full, dynamic beings capable of dialogue and transformation. Avoiding conflict reduces relationships to “I-It” interactions, where one person becomes an accessory to another’s fantasy.

At the same time, I have come to acknowledge my own freedom and responsibility in this situation. While I cannot force someone to confront conflict, I can choose how I respond. I can grieve the loss of the ideal relationship I once hoped for. I can set boundaries to preserve my own authenticity. I can continue to seek connection, knowing it may never be reciprocated in the way I desire.

In the end, relationships shaped by conflict avoidance are not just about the pain of what is unsaid—they are about the loss of what could have been. They serve as reminders of the cost of living inauthentically, of prioritizing comfort over growth, and of denying the struggles that make us human. This reflection is not just an intellectual exercise—it is a reckoning with the realities of love, family, and the courage it takes to face the truth.

Newer Therapy as Transformation: Confronting the Absurd and Embracing Growth
Back to list
Older Re-Discovery of Being